December 13, 2012
In 2011, the Obama administration proposed revising rules concerning the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to allow federal agencies to conceal information requested, fabricate information or deny the information existed to keep citizens, advocates and journalists from knowing the truth.
Under the guise of protecting national security secrets, those requests falling under FOIA would be in jeopardy with the issuance of a Glomar response – when the government neither confirms nor denies the existence of the requested material.
This essentially gives federal law enforcement agencies the right to lie to the American people without repercussions for the sake of protecting sensitive data and derails citizens from obtaining information about on-going cases that would expose governmental corruption.
This action becomes pertinent after investigations into vaccines and the UK government’s vaccine committees led to exposure of the scheme to keep parents ignorant about the dangers of inoculations for the sake of keeping children on a regular schedule of vaccines – which is leading to development of neurological disorders and death.
In the report entitled, “The Vaccination Policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI): Are They At Odds?” explains the “deliberate concealment [of] information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an ‘official’ vaccination schedule [which] could be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.”
Dr. Lucija Tomljeovic, author of the paper, states that “JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for ‘herd immunity’, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence.”
This is directly causational to children being exposed to dangerous and deadly vaccinations without the true nature of the substances being explained to parents prior to administering of the inoculations. The JCVI had complete knowledge of the risks and expected adverse effects of the vaccines, yet intentionally withheld those facts from parents; stifling their ability to make an informed decision which may have resulted in opting out of the vaccination program.
This was a direct violation of the International Code of Medical Ethics as well as the governmental adherence to the Code of Practice.
Tomljeovic reveals that “transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake.” The agendas of these meetings were never intended for public consumption nor made available and were pried out of the JCVI after FOIA requests.
Between 1983 and 2010 it is clear that:
• The JCVI intentionally “a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavorable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines”
• Suppressed access to contrary research to ensure adherence to vaccination schedules
• Collaborated with pharmaceutical corporations in hiding risks and dangerous side effect information
• Used bogus studies to justify the use of vaccines
• Used propaganda to coerce the public into keeping up with vaccine schedules
• Promoting more vaccines without providing information on their viability and necessity
• Thwarted research explaining the dangers of vaccines
• Used public ignorance against parents while engaging in fear-mongering to ensure they adhered to vaccine schedules
The same vaccines mentioned in this paper are administered to children in the US under coercion by pediatricians across the country.
Groups such as the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society take the influential position that they “oppose any legislation or regulation that would allow children to be exempted from mandatory immunizations based simply on their parents, or, in the case of adolescents, their own secular personal beliefs.”
In 2011, a study linked the incredible adherence to rising schedules of vaccines to the onset of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). There was an obvious correlation between the amount of vaccines, their dosages and SIDS in the data analyzed from 34 countries and records of 1000 babies.
Other studies have shown that the DTap inoculations are associated with numerous deaths of infants in the US.
Other health risks associated with vaccinations include:
• Influx of occurrences of autoimmune diseases
• Foreign protein particles
• Laundry detergent
In a vaccine study that was ignored by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) researchers discovered that when monkeys were injected with the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, they exhibited autistic reactions that mirror those that human children experience.
Laura Hewitson, Ph.D. and lead researcher, studied macaque monkeys that were given the exact same MMR vaccine as children in 1994 – 1999. The results entitled “Influence of pediatric vaccines on amydgala growth and opioid ligand binding in rhesus macaque infants: A pilot study” were published in Acta Neurobiological Experiments in 2010. This vaccine has the mercury based preservative Thimerasol.
Hewitson discovered that: “Vaccine-exposed and saline-injected control infants [monkeys] underwent MRI and PET imaging at approximately 4 and 6 months of age, representing two specific timeframes within the vaccination schedule . . . These results suggest that maturational changes in amygdala volume and the binding capacity of [11C]DPN in the amygdala was significantly altered in infant macaques receiving the vaccine schedule.”
The research paper documented findings that there were significant biological changes and altered behaviors that occurred in the vaccinated monkeys that were identical to children diagnosed with ASD (autism).
The unvaccinated monkey exhibited no changes or symptoms whatsoever.